@conference {ICBO_2018_11, title = {ICBO_2018_11: Planteome \& BisQue: Automating Image Annotation with Ontologies using Deep-Learning Networks}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

The field of computer vision has recently experienced tremendous progress due to advances in deep learning. This development holds particular promise in applications for plant research, due to a significant increase in the scale of image data harvesting and a strong field-driven interest in the automated processing of observable phenotypes and visible traits within agronomically important species. Parallel developments have occurred in semantic computing; for example, new ontologies have been initiated to capture plant traits and disease indicators. When combined with existing segmentation capabilities, it is possible to conceptualize software applications that give researchers the ability to analyze large quantities of plant phenotype image data, and to auto-annotate that data with meaningful, computable semantic terminology. We have previously reported on a software application that integrates segmentation and ontologies, but lacked the ability to manage very high-resolution images, and also lacked a database platform to allow for high-volume storage requirements. We have also previously reported our migration of the AISO user-guided segmentation feature to a BisQue (Bio-Image Semantic Query User Environment) module to take advantage of its increased power, ability to scale, secure data management environment, and collaborative software ecosystem. Neither AISO nor our initial BisQue implementation possessed a machine-learning component for interpreting (parts of) images. Plant researchers could benefit greatly from a trained classification model that predicts image annotations with a high degree of accuracy. We have therefore implemented two deep-learning prototypes: a coarse classification module for plant object identification (i.e. flower, fruit) and a fine-grained classification module that focuses on plant traits (e.g. reticulate vs. parallel venation, tip shape). Both classification models return results mapped to ontology terms as a form of annotation enrichment. This current version of the Planteome Deep Segmenter module combines image classification with optional guided segmentation and ontology annotation. We have most recently run the module on local Planteome BisQue client services, and are currently working with CyVerse to install a hosted version on their BisQue client service.

}, keywords = {annotation, convolutional neural networks, deep learning, image analysis, machine learning, Ontology, segmentation}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_11.pdf}, author = {Dimitrios Trigkakis and Justin Preece and Austin Meier and Justin Elser and Kris Kvilekval and Dmitry Fedorov and B.S. Manjunath and Pankaj Jaiswal and Sinisa Todorovic} } @conference {ICBO_2018_19, title = {ICBO_2018_19: Current Development in the Evidence and Conclusion Ontology (ECO)}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

The Evidence \& Conclusion Ontology (ECO) has been developed to provide standardized descriptions for types of evidence within the biological domain. Best practices in biocuration require that when a biological assertion is made (e.g. linking a Gene Ontology term for a molecular function to a protein), the type of evidence supporting it is captured. In recent development efforts, we have been working with other ontology groups to ensure that ECO classes exist for the types of curation they support. These include the Ontology for Microbial Phenotypes and the Gene Ontology. In addition, we continue to support user-level class requests through our GitHub issue tracker. To facilitate the addition and maintenance of new classes, we utilize ROBOT (a command line tool for working with Open Biomedical Ontologies) as part of our standard workflow. ROBOT templates allow us to define classes in a spreadsheet and convert them to Web Ontology Language (OWL) axioms, which can then be merged into ECO. ROBOT is also part of our automated release process. Additionally, we are engaged in ongoing work to map ECO classes to Ontology for Biomedical Investigation classes using logical definitions. ECO is currently in use by dozens of groups engaged in biological curation and the number of ECO users continues to grow. The ontology, in OWL and Open Biomedical Ontology (OBO) formats, and associated resources can be accessed through our GitHub site (https://github.com/evidenceontology/evidenceontology) as well as the ECO web page (http://evidenceontology.org/).

}, keywords = {biocuration, evidence, gene annotation, ontology development, ontology mapping}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_19.pdf }, author = {Rebecca Tauber and James B. Munro and Suvarna Nadendla and Binika Chunara and Marcus C. Chibucos and Michelle Giglio} } @conference {ICBO_2018_2, title = {ICBO_2018_2: Adapting Disease Vocabularies for Curation at the Rat Genome Database}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

The Rat Genome Database (RGD) has been annotating genes, QTLs, and strains to disease terms for over 15 years. During that time the controlled vocabulary used for disease curation has changed a few times. The changes were necessitated because no single vocabulary or ontology was freely accessible and complete enough to cover all of the disease states described in the biomedical literature. The first disease vocabulary used at RGD was the {\textquotedblleft}C{\textquotedblright} branch of the National Library of Medicine{\textquoteright}s Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). By 2011 RGD had switched disease curation to the use of MEDIC (MErged DIsease voCabulary), which is a combination of MeSH and OMIM (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man) constructed by curators at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD). MEDIC was an improvement over MeSH, because of the added coverage of OMIM terms, but it was not long before RGD curators saw the need for more disease terms. So within a couple of years, RGD began to add terms to MEDIC under the guise of the RGD Disease Ontology (RDO). Since RGD assigned a unique ID to every MEDIC term imported from CTD, it was easy to add specially coded IDs to indicate those additional terms from a separate, supplemental file. Meanwhile, the human disease ontology (DO) had slowly been developing and expanding. As early as 2010, members of RGD were contributing to the development of DO. Based on the promise of improvements, it was determined that the Alliance of Genome Resources could use the DO as a unifying disease vocabulary across model organism databases. Despite the improvements in DO, RGD still had more than 1000 custom terms and 3800 MEDIC terms with annotations to deal with if RGD would convert to the use of DO. If RGD mapped those non-DO disease terms to DO, much granularity of meaning would be lost. To avoid the loss of granularity it was decided to extend the DO after import of the merged, already axiomized DO file. So after mapping DO completely to the RGD version of MEDIC, a broader, deeper disease vocabulary has been achieved.

}, keywords = {curation, disease vocabularies, online resource, Rat Genome Database}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_2.pdf }, author = {Stan Laulederkind and G. Thomas Hayman and Shur-Jen Wang and Elizabeth Bolton and Jennifer R. Smith and Marek Tutaj and Jeff de Pons and Mary Shimoyama and Melinda Dwinell} } @conference {ICBO_2018_23, title = {ICBO_2018_23: Prot{\'e}g{\'e} 5.5 {\textendash} Improvements for Editing Biomedical Ontologies}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

We present Prot{\'e}g{\'e} 5.5, a significant update to the Prot{\'e}g{\'e} Desktop software, which contains new features that are geared towards editing biomedical ontologies. This version of Prot{\'e}g{\'e} contains user-interface enhancements and optimizations that should make the browsing and editing of OBO-library-style biomedical ontologies easier, faster and more efficient when compared to previous versions of Prot{\'e}g{\'e}.

}, keywords = {Biomedical Ontology Editing, OWL, Prot{\'e}g{\'e}}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_23.pdf }, author = {Matthew Horridge and Rafael S Gon{\c c}alves and Csongor I Nyulas and Tania Tudorache and Mark Musen} } @conference {ICBO_2018_31, title = {ICBO_2018_31: Test-driven Ontology Development in Prot{\'e}g{\'e}}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

Over the past decade, various quality assurance methodologies have emerged in the field of software engineering for preventing, detecting, and fixing faults and bugs in software. In particular, Test-driven Development (TDD) is now a popular quality assurance technique whereby extensive usage of test cases can be used to enforce the correctness of software artifacts. While testing has made its way into the field of ontology engineering, where some techniques for testing ontologies are now used in prominent biomedical ontology projects, Test-driven Development has yet to achieve significant uptake. In this paper we propose a Logic-Based Test-driven Ontology Development methodology, which takes cues from Test-Driven Development in the field of software engineering. Our hope is that this will encourage a "test-first" approach to ontology engineering and that it will form part of the arsenal available to ontology engineers in order to help them produce and maintain high quality ontologies. Test cases in our framework are represented by simple statements describing expected and/or unwanted logical consequences of an intended ontology. As with Test-driven Development in software engineering, our approach encourages small, frequent iterations in the testing and development life-cycle. We provide and present tool support for our approach in the form of OntoDebug {\textendash}- a plug-in for the ontology editor Prot{\'e}g{\'e}.

}, keywords = {ontology quality assurance, Prot{\'e}g{\'e} Plug-In, Test-Driven Ontology Development}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_31.pdf }, author = {Konstantin Schekotihin and Patrick Rodler and Wolfgang Schmid and Matthew Horridge and Tania Tudorache} } @conference {ICBO_2018_32, title = {ICBO_2018_32: Ontolobridge {\textendash} A Semi-Automated Ontology Update Request System for Better FAIR-ifying BioAssay Ontology, Drug Target Ontology, and LINCS Ontology}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {Ontologies are products that are becoming more relevant for data science as the need for standardized vocabulary and meta-data is increasing. However, if they want to stay relevant, ontologies have a constant need for evolving, especially in domains that involve dynamic data, like life-sciences data. Based on the need pointed out by domain experts for updating and/or requesting ontology terms while annotating BioAssay Protocols, we are developing a semi-automated technology that will allow users to request new terms and update existing ones easier. This need was pointed out by domain experts who are using CDD{\textquoteright}s new tool BioAssay Express (BAE). BAE allows users to annotate their bioassays in a semi-automated and standardized fashion using the highly-accessed ontologies (BioAssay Ontology (BAO), Gene Ontology (GO), Disease Ontology (DOID), and Drug Target Ontology (DTO) among others) in the background. Our goal in the Ontolobridge project is to help various users of BAE (researchers performing curation, dedicated curators, IT specialists, ontology owners, and librarians/repositories) request and update the existing vocabulary provided by BAO in a semi-automated way, with a user-friendly interface. Furthermore, APIs and tools including templates from CEDAR will be created in order to would allow users to request new ontology terms or changes to existing terms easily during the annotation process. In this way, we{\textquoteright}re aiming to increase the Findability, Interoperability, Accessibility, and Reproducibility (FAIR) of above mentioned ontologies and BioAssay Protocols better.}, keywords = {annotation, big data, BioAssay Express, BioAssay Ontology, CEDAR, FAIR, FAIR data, life sciences big data, ontology term request, semi-automated ontology updates}, url = {http://icbo2018.cgrb.oregonstate.edu/}, author = {Hande K{\"u}{\c c}{\"u}k-Mcginty and Alex Clark and John Graybeal and Daniel Cooper and John Turner and Michael Dorf and Mark Musen and Barry Bunin and Stephan Schurer} } @conference {ICBO_2018_43, title = {ICBO_2018_43: Domain Informational Vocabulary Extraction Experiences with Publication Pipeline Integration and Ontology Curation}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

We will present updates on an ongoing project DIVE (Domain Informational Vocabulary Extraction), a system designed for extracting domain information from scientific publications. DIVE implements an ensemble of text mining methods for biological entity extraction from article text. DIVE also attempts use the co-occurrence patterns of these entities to establish probable relationships between them. DIVE also features an improved web interface for expert user curation of extracted information, thereby providing a means for a constantly growing and expert curated body of domain information for an article corpus. We also discuss our experiences from successful integration of DIVE with the publishing pipeline for two prominent Plant Biology Journals (The Plant Cell and Plant Physiology) from ASPB (American Society of Plant Biologists). The extracted results are embedded at the end of the final proof of the published article to enhance its accessibility and discoverability. Furthermore, DIVE tracks expert user curation actions on its web interface for future training and improvement of the entity detection algorithm.

}, keywords = {big data, Cyberinfrastructure, DIVE, machine learning, Ontology}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_43.pdf }, author = {Amit Gupta and Weijia Xu and Pankaj Jaiswal and Crispin Taylor and Jennifer Regala} } @conference {ICBO_2018_46, title = {ICBO_2018_46: Standardizing Ontology Workflows Using ROBOT}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

Building and maintaining ontologies can be challenging due to the need to automate a number of common tasks, such as running quality control checks, automatic classification using reasoners, generating standard reports, extracting application-specific subsets, and managing ontology dependencies. These workflows are in some aspects analogous to workflows used in software engineering as part of the normal product lifecycle. However, in contrast to software development, there is a lack of easy to use tooling to support the execution of these workflows for ontology developers

}, keywords = {automation, import management, ontology development, ontology release, OWL, quality control, reasoning, workflows}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_46.pdf }, author = {Rebecca Tauber and James Balhoff and Eric Douglass and Chris Mungall and James A. Overton} } @conference {ICBO_2018_59, title = {ICBO_2018_59: Coordinated Evolution of Ontologies of Informed Consent}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

Our project brings together a number of OBO Foundry ontologies related to the representation of informed consent, and expands and enriches them, so that they may provide a representation of informed consent across the informed consent (IC) life cycle. The IC lifecycle involves not only documentation of the consent when originally obtained, but actions that require clear communication of permissions from the initial acquisition of data and specimens through handoffs to, for example, secondary researchers, allowing them access to data or biospecimens referenced in the terms of the original consent. This poster details the progress we have made in representing the domain of consent, as well as the future applications that such work can make possible.

}, keywords = {informed consent, informed consent life cycle, ontology collaboration, reference ontology}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_59.pdf }, author = {J. Neil Otte and Cooper Stansbury and Jonathan Vajda and Frank Manion and Elizabeth Umberfield and Yongqun He and Marcelline Harris and Jihad Obeid and Mathias Brochhausen and William Duncan and Cui Tao} } @conference {ICBO_2018_61, title = {ICBO_2018_61: Using the Oral Health and Disease Ontology to Study Dental Outcomes in National Dental PBRN Practices}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

The use of electronic dental records (EDR) has grown rapidly over the past decade, but the development of methods to use EDR data for research and quality improvement is still in its infancy. In this poster, we present our work in which use the Oral Health and Disease Ontology to integrate EDR data from 99 National Dental PBRN practices in order to study the longevity of posterior composite restorations and the rate of tooth loss following root canal treatments.

}, keywords = {dental procedure, dental research, Ontology, posterior composite restoration, root canal treatment}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_61.pdf }, author = {William Duncan and Thankam Thyvalikakath and Zasim Siddiqui and Michelle LaPradd and Chen Wen and Jim Zheng and Anna Roberts and Daniel Hood and Titus Schleyer and Aparna Manimangalam and Donald Rindal and Mark Jurkovich and Tracy Shea and David Bogacz and Terrence Yu and Jeffry Fellows and Valerie Gordan and Gregg Gilbert} } @conference {ICBO_2018_70, title = {ICBO_2018_70: Improving Convergence Rates of Deep Learning for Very Small Image Training Sets}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {Typical visualization tasks in the domain of big image datasets include: image retrieval, clustering, and segmentation. Recently, there has been a tremendous progress in solving these tasks using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNNs typically require large training sets of manually annotated images for deep learning, which, however, is often impossible to provide in various applications, including image-based biological and medical research. This talk will address one way to address this critical issue {\textendash} a new CNN learning approach, based on second-order methods, aimed at improving: a) Convergence rates of existing gradient-based methods, and b) Robustness to the choice of learning hyper-parameters (e.g., learn- ing rate). Our approach simultaneously computes both gradients and second derivatives of the CNN{\textquoteright}s learning objective, and performs second-order back-propagation. In comparison with standard gradient-based deep learning, our evaluation demonstrates that we achieve faster convergences rates, and converge to better optima leading to better performance under a budgeted time for learning.}, keywords = {computer vision, deep learning, species classification}, url = {http://icbo2018.cgrb.oregonstate.edu/}, author = {Sinisa Todorovic} } @conference {ICBO_2018_71, title = {ICBO_2018_71: Comparative functional analysis in plants with Gramene}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {Gramene (http://www.gramene.org) is an integrated resource for comparative functional analysis in plants, and provides researchers with access to 53 genomes and pathways for 75 plant species. Gramene includes powerful phylogenetic approaches, such as protein-based gene trees with stable IDs and whole-genome DNA alignments, enabling comparison across plant species. Gramene also provides integrated search capabilities and interactive views to locate and visualize gene features, gene neighborhoods, phylogenetic trees, genetic variation, gene expression profiles, pathways, ontology associations, and curated and orthology-projected pathways. Gramene builds upon Ensembl and Reactome software, and is committed to open access and reproducible science based on FAIR principles. Gramene is supported by an NSF grant IOS-1127112, and from USDA-ARS (1907-21000-030-00D).}, keywords = {annotation, comparative analysis, functional genomics, ontology associations, pathways, plants}, url = {http://icbo2018.cgrb.oregonstate.edu/}, author = {Parul Gupta and Justin Preece and Pankaj Jaiswal and Marcela K. Tello-Ruiz and Sharon Wei and Sushma Naithani and Andrew Olson and Joshua Stein and Yinping Jiao and Bo Wang and Sunita Kumari and Young Koung Lee and Vivek Kumar} } @conference {174, title = {ICBO_2018_75: ECOCORE: An ontology for core ecological concepts}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

The ontologies in the biological and biomedical domain represent entities from a broad spectrum of the life sciences such as molecules, diseases, phenotypes, and environments. However, until now, ontologies representing ecological concepts, such as trophic modes like autotrophy and insectivory, have been missing. In response to the needs of aggregators such as the Encyclopedia of Life and DataONE, we have developed an ontology of core ecological concepts, ECOCORE. The initial focus of development for ECOCORE is trophic dynamics. An example demonstrating this initial focus is the autotroph class, which is a subclass of organism. It is equivalent to organism and ({\textquoteleft}capable of{\textquoteright} some autotrophy). Autotrophy is a process. ECOCORE development calls on classes from many OBO ontologies, but involves specifically important collaborations with the Environment Ontology, the Behavior Ontology, and the Relations Ontology. ECOCORE development is open to community participation at the GitHub site https://github.com/EcologicalSemantics/ecocore. This presentation will describe ECOCORE and show some of its uses.

}, keywords = {biodiversity, ecology, evolutionary biology, Ontology, ontology development, trophic dynamics}, url = {http://icbo2018.cgrb.oregonstate.edu/}, author = {Anne Thessen and Pier Luigi Buttigieg and Ramona Walls and Jennifer Verdolin and Katja Schulz} } @conference {ICBO_2018_9, title = {ICBO_2018_9: A Prot{\'e}g{\'e} Plug-In for Test-Driven Ontology Development}, booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2018)}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Ontology (2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {08/06/2018}, publisher = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, organization = {International Conference on Biological Ontology}, abstract = {

Ontology development is a hard and often error-prone process, which requires ontology authors to correctly express their domain knowledge in a formal language. One way to ensure the quality of the resulting ontology is to use test cases, similarly to the best practices in software development. For ontology development, test cases can be specified as statements describing expected and/or unwanted logical consequences of an ontology. However, verifying the test cases and identifying the ontology parts that cause their violation is a complex task, which requires appropriate tool support. In this demo, we present OntoDebug {\textendash} a plug-in for the Prot{\'e}g{\'e} editor {\textendash} that supports test-driven ontology development. OntoDebug can automatically verify whether the ontology satisfies all defined test cases. If any test case is violated, the plug-in assists the user in debugging and repairing the ontology in an interactive way. The plug-in asks a series of questions about the ontology to pinpoint the faulty axioms. Once a fault is repaired, all answers that the author provided in the interactive debugging session may be converted into test cases, thus preserving the additional knowledge, which can be used in future testing of the ontology.

}, keywords = {Fault Detection in Ontologies, Fault Localization in Ontologies, Fault Repair in Ontologies, Ontology Debugging, Prot{\'e}g{\'e} Plug-In, Test-Driven Ontology Development, User Interaction}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2285/ICBO_2018_paper_9.pdf }, author = {Konstantin Schekotihin and Patrick Rodler and Wolfgang Schmid and Matthew Horridge and Tania Tudorache} }